Thanks to heavy endorsements and celeb promotions, anti‑aging treatments have soared in popularity across the country, and Idaho is no different. Aging is inevitable, but if you choose the right way to address the signs, you can expect incredible outcomes. In that context, there are two major non-surgical options – wrinkle reducers and dermal fillers. Clinics like therjcidaho.com in Pocatello offer the choice of both. Experts at The Regenerative & Joint Clinic evaluate every detail before suggesting any options. Both are different, and in this guide, we will discuss each.
A Look at Wrinkle Reducers
So, what is a wrinkle reducer? As the name suggests, these are designed to reduce the appearance of wrinkles. You might have heard of names like Botox, Dysport, and Xeomin, which are nothing but wrinkle reducers. These are injectables that contain neurotoxins, which block nerve signals to targeted muscles and cause wrinkles to relax. Wrinkle reducers are often used for correcting frown lines, Crow’s feet, and forehead lines. The results can last for three to four months.
There are several benefits of wrinkle reducers. Firstly, being injectables, the treatment is minimally invasive and has little to no downtime. Secondly, you should see a visible difference as you continue treatment. The wrinkles will reduce significantly over time.
Understanding Dermal Fillers
As we age, our skin doesn’t produce as much collagen, which causes volume loss. In other words, the cheeks of a 40-year-old woman wouldn’t look as full as those of a 25-year-old. Dermal fillers are also injectables, but don’t fix wrinkles. Instead, they restore the fullness of the face and are often used to treat volume loss in cheeks, smile lines, lips, jawline, and under-eye hollows.
Dermal fillers have many benefits, too. Besides smoothing out static wrinkles, these injectables ensure results last for six to eighteen months. With Botox, the results emerge with time, but with dermal fillers, you can see an immediate change in your facial appearance.
Wrinkle Reducers vs. Dermal Fillers: Key Differences
Now, let’s discuss how both treatments differ. Wrinkle reducers are mostly used for treating dynamic wrinkles, which start appearing due to repetitive movements, such as smiling. Fillers, on the other hand, are best for static wrinkles and volume loss. Both are minimally invasive injectables, but with fillers, there may be slight swelling after each session. As we discussed before, the outcome last for different times. Botox-induced effects often last between three and four months, while the look with fillers can last for about a year or more, depending on the filler used. Fillers cost more upfront compared to Botox, but again, results also last longer.
Choosing the Right Option
There is no singular formula that will work for every person. When you visit an aesthetic clinic, the experts will check your skin, current concerns, and overall medical history to determine what may work best for you. There are several aspects that matter, such as the type of wrinkles you have, current age, skin elasticity, and overall personal goals. Aesthetic doctors will also evaluate your lifestyle and determine if a combination of both treatments is likely to work better.
Side Effects, After Care, & More
Botox and most other wrinkle reducers can cause mild redness and swelling at the injection site. You may also experience temporary muscle weakness, which is a rare risk that happens if injected incorrectly. Dermal fillers can also cause mild swelling and bruising, and if injections aren’t used correctly, there can be rare risks of lumps.
If you are visiting a skin rejuvenation clinic in Pocatello, don’t shy away from asking questions and discussing the pros and cons that are unique to your case. Ensure you understand the treatment process, considering you will need to repeat injectables after a point to retain the results.